Catchy titles for online dating

Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles apa

Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles,People also downloaded these free PDFs

 · We examined how users perceive attractiveness in online dating profiles, which provide their first exposure to a potential partner. Participants rated whole profiles and profile Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Andrew T. Fiore 1, Lindsay S. Taylor 2, G.A. Mendelsohn 2, and Marti Hearst 1 1 School of Information and 2 Department of Psychology Title: Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Authors: Andrew T. Fiore, Lindsay S. Taylor, G. A. Mendelsohn and Marti Hearst, University of California, Berkeley Contact: Review your assessing sex right attractiveness site that gives you meet people around the goal is a completely in online dating profiles apa site with singles The ages of assessing We examined how users perceive attractiveness in online dating profiles, which provide their first exposure to a potential partner. Participants rated whole profiles and profile components on ... read more

Authors: Advanced Search Include Citations. DMCA Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Cached Download Links [people. edu] [people. Save to List Add to Collection Correct Errors Monitor Changes. by Andrew T. Fiore , Lindsay S. Taylor , G. Mendelsohn , Marti Hearst. Citations: 12 - 3 self. Summary Citations Active Bibliography Co-citation Clustered Documents Version History.

Abstract Online dating systems play a prominent role in the social lives of millions of their users, but little research has considered how users perceive one another through their personal profiles. Keyphrases online dating profile free-text component important role overall attractiveness social life different way attractiveness rating little research whole profile whole profile attractiveness potential partner first exposure numerous quality author keywords online personal prominent role personal profile fixed-choice element past research profile component.

Powered by:. Participants rated whole profiles and profile components on such qualities as how attractive, extraverted, and genuine and trustworthy they appeared. As past research in the psychology of attraction would suggest, the attractiveness and other qualities of the photograph were the strongest predictors of whole profile attractiveness, but they were not alone: the free-text component also played an important role in predicting overall attractiveness.

In turn, numerous other qualities predicted the attractiveness ratings of photos and free-text components, albeit in different ways for men and women. The fixed-choice elements of a profile, however, were unrelated to attractiveness. Author s Marti Hearst. View online.

edu no longer supports Internet Explorer. To browse Academia. edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles Proceeding of the twenty …, Andrew Fiore.

Download Download PDF Full PDF Package Download Full PDF Package This Paper. A short summary of this paper. PDF Pack. People also downloaded these PDFs. People also downloaded these free PDFs. Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs by Catalina Toma. Download Free PDF Download PDF Download Free PDF View PDF. Not the Cat's Meow? The Impact of Posing with Cats on Female Perceptions of Male Dateability by Shelly Volsche.

Self-Generated Versus Other-Generated Statements and Impressions In Computer-Mediated Communication: A Test of Warranting Theory Using Facebook by Hillary Shulman. Theories of Computer- Mediated Communication and Interpersonal Relations by 佐朋 戴. Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential by Anthony J Lee. The effects of static avatars on impression formation across different contexts on social networking sites by Nicholas Bowman.

by Brandon Van Der Heide. Impression Management Struggles in Online Dating by Doug Zytko. Download Download PDF. Download Full PDF Package. Translate PDF. Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Andrew T. Fiore1, Lindsay S. Taylor2, G. Mendelsohn2, and Marti Hearst1 1 School of Information and 2Department of Psychology University of California, Berkeley South Hall, Berkeley, Calif.

edu, 2{lstaylor, jermend} berkeley. edu ABSTRACT callers to listen to recorded voice advertisements from other Online dating systems play a prominent role in the social users and sometimes connect with them live, have been lives of millions of their users, but little research has around for decades, and even today their television considered how users perceive one another through their advertisements pepper late-night programming. Computer personal profiles. We examined how users perceive matching services, which purport to identify compatible attractiveness in online dating profiles, which provide their singles from their pool of members, existed well before the first exposure to a potential partner.

As past research in the psychology of National Computer Dating Service. attraction would suggest, the attractiveness and other qualities of the photograph were the strongest predictors of Today, we have a variety of richer means of mediated whole profile attractiveness, but they were not alone: the communication. Among these, online dating systems now free-text component also played an important role in claim a prominent role in the social lives of millions of predicting overall attractiveness.

In turn, numerous other users. US News and World Report claimed that in August qualities predicted the attractiveness ratings of photos and alone, 40 million unique users visited online dating free-text components, albeit in different ways for men and Web sites Mulrine ; the Pew Internet and American women. The fixed-choice elements of a profile, however, Life Project estimates that about 7 million American adults were unrelated to attractiveness. have gone on a date with someone they met through online personal advertisements Madden and Lenhart We designed this study to examine how users H5.

Group and Organization Interfaces; Asynchronous evaluate the attractiveness of an online dating profile as a interaction; Web-based interaction. whole from its qualities and the qualities of its components.

Telephone dating systems, which allow al. But by the mids, some researchers Lea and Spears ; Parks and Floyd began to suggest that a relative scarcity of social cues might not be as detrimental Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for as the earlier work claimed, and that it might in fact aid the personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are formation of interpersonal connections under some not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page.

To copy otherwise, circumstances. CHI , April 5—10, , Florence, Italy. this view. That is, they are able to tailor their self- another than they would face-to-face. This results, Walther presentations online in ways they cannot face-to-face.

argues, from a tendency to fill in the blanks optimistically Users writing their profiles have competing motivations — when faced with limited information about a person. Other first, to present themselves as attractively as possible, in studies also show evidence of greater affinity in cue- order to draw the attention of potential dates, and second, to constrained contexts.

McKenna and colleagues found present themselves accurately, so that people who are that pairs of college students in a laboratory study liked each attracted to them online will still find them attractive when other better when they met in synchronous, text-only chat they eventually meet. Fiore and Donath suggest that than when they met face-to-face. Online gamers rating online dating users might consider a certain amount of potential opponents in Riegelsberger et al. The researchers suggest that photo profiles competitors.

that small exaggerations about height, weight, and age in online dating profiles were common. Self-presentation and Interpersonal Perception Goffman describes the process of self-presentation Since users can self-present selectively or aspirationally as a kind of performance. accurate picture of what another user is like in person. If Building on these notions and the concept of signaling from the purpose of online dating were to find partners with biology, Donath ; forthcoming portrays the online whom to interact online only, this would pose no problem performance of self as a series of signals we attempt to give — the online relationship would be the end goal.

But in order to convey a particular impression to others. Historically, theories of interpersonal attraction and interpersonal judgments have emphasized the importance of Face-to-face interaction is a rich medium — that is, it physical attributes over other factors such as personality provides multiple channels of communication e. tone of voice, facial expression, gesture and immediate Accordingly, online dating sites often urge their users to feedback Daft and Lengel In a face-to-face context, post photos of themselves to increase the chances that in addition to information conveyed intentionally, cues potential dates will contact them.

or her profile Whitty and Carr At the same time, however, the bulk of conveyed in online environments. traits of the profile owners. Only a few studies so far have considered how users judge attractiveness online generally or in online dating in particular.

Ellison and colleagues describe the 1 Facebook, a social networking Web site, has personal strategies employed by online dating users to interpret the profiles that share many features with online dating profiles self-presentations of others. Information Processing. To gather five profiles of each gender in each city, Perhaps needless to say, in her own photo, she was standing we searched for profiles with photos meeting the Ellison et al.

appropriate criteria — e. The search online dating users believe they will like people better when results were approximately but not strictly ordered by they have more information about them, in fact more recency of activity, so the profiles we captured belonged to information leads to less liking, perhaps because it helps us users who had logged in recently.

better to assess incompatibility. Thus, an components. First, the fixed-choice portion contains a series online dating profile with a lot of information might attract of multiple-choice questions with pre-set responses, fewer — but potentially more compatible — suitors.

including demographics, such as age, gender, race, and religion, and preferences, such as smoking and drinking Fiore and Donath used the number of messages habits, favorite activities, and interests. Not all profiles online daters received as a measure of attractiveness and included responses to every fixed-choice item.

Next, the found that men received more messages when they were free-text section allows users to describe themselves and the older, more educated, and had higher levels of self-reported partner they seek in their own words; these sections range attractiveness which might be something more like self- from a few words to many paragraphs. Finally, each profile esteem. Personals crops the primary profiles.

These results roughly correspond to what we photos, so all were headshots. would expect from past social psychological research. We saved images of these profiles exactly as they appeared Although this latter study comes closest, none of the in the Web browser and then subdivided them with Adobe aforementioned studies speaks directly to our research Photoshop into these three components: the free-text part of question: What qualities of online dating profiles and their the profile, the primary photo, and the fixed-choice part of components predict attractiveness?

the profile Figure 1. With 50 profiles, this process yielded a total of images, including images of whole profiles. ONLINE DATING SYSTEMS Broadly speaking, Web-based online dating systems Using a custom-built Web application that identified include the following Fiore and Donath : participants only by an anonymous number, we asked participants their own sex and the sex of the people they  Personal profiles for each user, which include usually date.

Our software then presented each participant demographic and other fixed-choice responses, free- with a randomly selected series of profile components free text responses to prompts, and, optionally, one or more text, fixed choice, and photo and whole profiles drawn photographs.

from the 25 profiles of the appropriate gender. profiles on a typical system. The software Figure 2 asked participants to rate whole  Some means of private communication that permits profiles and profile components using a five-point Likert- users to contact potential dates within the closed online type scale from 0 not at all to 4 very much on the dating system without disclosing an email address, following dimensions: phone number, or identifying information.

Personals Web site, comprising five men and five The order of these dimensions was randomized with each women between 20 and 30 years of age from each of five profile or profile component for each participant so as to U. cities — Atlanta, Boston, San Diego, Seattle, and St. avoid order effects. Left and above One of the 50 online dating oi profiles, obfuscated to protect the privacy of the profile author.

Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles,Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles

We examined how users perceive attractiveness in online dating profiles, which provide their first exposure to a potential partner. Participants rated whole profiles and profile components on Title: Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Authors: Andrew T. Fiore, Lindsay S. Taylor, G. A. Mendelsohn and Marti Hearst, University of California, Berkeley Contact: Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Andrew T. Fiore Lindsay Shaw Taylor School of Information Department of Psychology University of California, Berkeley G. A.  · We examined how users perceive attractiveness in online dating profiles, which provide their first exposure to a potential partner. Participants rated whole profiles and profile Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Andrew T. Fiore1, Lindsay S. Taylor2, G.A. Mendelsohn2, and Marti Hearst1 1School of Information and 2Depart Assessing Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles Andrew T. Fiore 1, Lindsay S. Taylor 2, G.A. Mendelsohn 2, and Marti Hearst 1 1 School of Information and 2 Department of Psychology ... read more

None of the two-way however. Additionally, a strong jaw-line or a symmetrical face; in fact, participants lower ratings on self-centeredness were associated with the associated many other qualities with attractiveness. would expect from past social psychological research. O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E The Role of Friends' Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep by Ana Vatavi. McKenna and colleagues found that pairs of college students in a laboratory study liked each other better when they met in synchronous, text-only chat than when they met face-to-face. In Dating: When Do You Like Someone Like Yourself? London: Overview.

At the end of the period, to 4 scale. Emotional, and Language Processes in Disclosure. Dion et al. Mapping Love in Online Dating Communities, in: Alev Degim, James Johnson and Tao Fu eds. McKenna and colleagues found that pairs of college students in a laboratory study liked each other better when they met in synchronous, text-only chat than when they met face-to-face.

Categories: